India’s evolving diplomatic position on the Israel-Palestine conflict

Detailed Concept

India abstained from a UNGA resolution (June 2025) calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, marking the fourth abstention in three years on resolutions critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza. The latest resolution, introduced by Spain, was passed by an overwhelming majority (149 in favor, 19 abstentions).

Despite expressing concern over humanitarian crises, India cited "continuity in position" as the reason for abstention, aligning with previous votes (2022, 2023, 2024) where it refrained from directly criticizing Israel.

Data & Facts

Key Facts	Details
Resolution Title	"Protection of civilians and upholding legal and humanitarian obligations"
Vote Outcome	149 in favor, 19 abstentions, 11 against (incl. USA, Israel)
India's Vote	Abstention
Past Indian Votes	Abstained in Oct 2023, Dec 2022, Dec 2024
Palestinian Death Toll (as cited)	Over 55,000
India-Palestine Relations	India recognized Palestine in 1988; maintains diplomatic ties

Comparison & Analysis

Parameter	Past Position	Current Shift
India's stance in Dec 2024	Voted in favor of Gaza ceasefire	Now abstained (June 2025)
Broader South Asian View	Other SAARC, BRICS, SCO members supported resolution	India was only abstainer among them
Diplomatic Positioning	Balanced support to Palestine and Israel	Appears closer to Israel/US line, cautious on Gaza ceasefire

Analysis:

India seems to be balancing strategic ties with the US-Israel bloc, especially in the context of Indo-US defence deals and growing ties with Israel in tech/security.
The abstention, despite humanitarian concerns, signals a realpolitik approach over earlier non-alignment style moral diplomacy.

Comments

Stem Cell: The Long-Term Effects of Stem Cell Transplants

The Long-Term Effects of Stem Cell Transplants: What New Research Tells Us About Mutation Rates and Blood Cell Regeneration A groundbreaking study on hematopoietic stem cell transplants, often used to treat blood cancers, has provided insight into the long-term behavior of donor stem cells in recipients. Published in Science Translational Medicine , this study examined 16 unique pairs of donors and recipients who had survived decades after transplant—some for as long as 46 years. The findings revealed intriguing clues about how these transplanted cells change over time and raised new questions about the regenerative potential of bone marrow. Background on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants For patients battling blood cancers, hematopoietic stem cell transplants are often the best treatment option. In this procedure, stem cells from a healthy donor are transferred to a recipient, taking over the job of rebuilding the entire blood cell production system in the new host. Thes...

INTERVIEW Q&A FOR EXPERIENCE CANDIDATE

When answering the interview question " Why did you leave your previous company? ", the key is to remain positive, professional, and honest while aligning your response with the new opportunity. Avoid criticizing your previous employer or colleagues. Here are some sample answers tailored to different situations: 1. For Career Growth and Learning Opportunities "I had a great experience at my previous company and learned a lot, but I felt it was time to seek new challenges that align better with my career goals. I’m particularly interested in this role because it offers opportunities to expand my skills in [specific area] and contribute to [specific objective]." 2. Seeking New Challenges "I enjoyed my time at my last company, but I realized I had reached a point where I wanted to take on more challenging projects and expand my expertise. This position excites me because it offers the chance to work on [specific projects/skills] and grow further in my career....

The Dunning-Kruger effect

More Info: Dunning Kruger Effect #dunningkugereffect #superioritycomplex Crux of this effect: Low knowledge, high confidence Dunning-Kruger effect , in psychology , a cognitive bias whereby people with limited knowledge or competence in a given intellectual or social domain greatly overestimate their own knowledge or competence in that domain relative to objective criteria or to the performance of their peers or of people in general. According to the researchers for whom it is named, psychologists David Dunning and Justin Kruger, the effect is explained by the fact that the metacognitive ability to recognize deficiencies in one’s own knowledge or competence requires that one possess at least a minimum level of the same kind of knowledge or competence, which those who exhibit the effect have not attained. Because they are unaware of their deficiencies, such people generally assume that they are not deficient...

Factlysis

Search This Blog