Skip to main content

Global Gender Gap Report 2025 – India’s Performance and Global Context

 

1. Detailed Concept

The Global Gender Gap Report 2025, released by the World Economic Forum (WEF), measures gender parity across four dimensions:

India is ranked 131 out of 148 countries, with an overall parity score of 64.1%, making it one of the lowest-ranked in South Asia.

 

2. Data & Facts

 

India’s 2025 Rankings:

  • Overall Rank: 131/148 (↓ from 129/146 in 2024)

  • Overall Parity Score: 64.1%

Economic Participation & Opportunity: 40.7% (↑ by 0.9 percentage points)

Top Global Performers:

  1. Iceland

  2. Finland

  3. Norway

  4. United Kingdom

  5. New Zealand

South Asia Comparison:

Country

Rank (2025)

Highlights

Bangladesh

24

+75 ranks, gains in political & economic parity

Nepal

125

 

Sri Lanka

130

Slightly better than India

India

131

Slight improvement in economy & education

Bhutan

119

 

Maldives

138

 

Pakistan

148

Worst performer globally

 

 

3. Comparison & Analysis

Dimension

2024

2025

Analysis

Overall Rank

129/146

131/148

Relative decline due to better performance by peers

Economic Opportunity

~39.8%

40.7%

Minor rise in earned income parity

Educational Attainment

~95%

97.1%

Good performance; female literacy, enrollment rise

Health & Survival

Moderate

Improved

Due to better sex ratio & life expectancy parity

Political Empowerment

↓ 14.7%

↓ 13.8%

Regression due to reduced female MP share

 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Marxist Insight Remains Relevant: Capitalism in the 21st Century

At a time when neoliberal capitalism dominates the global order, one might assume Marxist theory has faded into irrelevance. Yet, the opposite is true. From the gig economy to the climate crisis , the insights of Karl Marx and subsequent Marxist thinkers continue to offer powerful tools to analyze — and challenge — the deep inequalities embedded in today’s society. Here’s why Marxism is not just a relic of the past, but a lens through which we can understand the contradictions of our present. Gig Economy and Surplus Value: Marx Was Right The rise of the gig economy — with its food delivery workers, ride-share drivers, and freelance coders — mirrors Marx’s idea of surplus value : the notion that workers produce more value than they are paid, and the surplus is pocketed by capitalists. Gig workers face no job security , no benefits , and algorithmic control . Despite being marketed as “freedom” and “flexibility,” platform capitalism has intensified the precarity of labour ...

Reading the Sky, Missing the Signs: Climate Change Challenges Tribal Weather Wisdom

By Anand Gupta | July 2025 For centuries, the tribal communities of Jharkhand have lived in harmony with nature—not just spiritually, but scientifically. Their agricultural calendars, social rituals, and food security depended not on satellites or Doppler radars, but on lipi birds , kaash flowers , black ants , and tamarind harvests . But as climate change accelerates, even these time-tested signs are losing their reliability. The Living Almanac of Nature In the remote villages of Jharkhand’s Khunti and Gumla districts, elders like Ashok Munda still read the sky, soil, and bird behavior like a living almanac. A larger nest by the lipi bird (common swift) signals less rain . If amaltas trees bloom densely, good rains are expected. On Sarhul , villagers fill pots with water to predict seasonal rainfall by checking next-day evaporation. Kaash flowers mark the end of the monsoon , while ant movements and a red morning sky signal imminent rains. A bountiful tamarind...

The Remote Work Paradox: Between Autonomy and Anxiety

The quiet revolution of remote work , once celebrated as the inevitable future of labour, has unfolded into a far more tangled reality than imagined. For millions worldwide, the dream of flexible hours, zero commute, and working in pyjamas persists — yet in practice, far fewer actually enjoy its benefits. This growing gulf between aspiration and implementation reveals deeper issues: cultural inertia, managerial distrust, infrastructural gaps, gender burdens, and overlooked health costs . A Global Survey: Dreams vs. Reality The “ Global Survey of Working Arrangements ” (2024–25), jointly conducted by the Ifo Institute and Stanford University , paints a vivid picture. Over 16,000 college-educated workers across 40 countries were asked how many days they ideally want to work remotely and how many they actually do. In the U.S., U.K., and Canada , workers average 1.6 remote days per week , fairly close to their ideal. In Asia , it's just 1.1 days , even though workers want ...